LadyJoyX This beautiful young tranny has a gorgeous body and huge dick that she uses to give satisfaction to anyone who needs it. See on how her raw meat pounds her dude's tight ass hole, pounding harder and faster until she reaches orgasm.

This beautiful young tranny has a gorgeous body and huge dick that she uses to give satisfaction to anyone who needs it. See on how her raw meat pounds her dudes tight ass hole, pounding harder and faster until she reaches orgasm.This gorgeous models are in for a great surprise after their exhausting shoot. The crew managing the shoot got so horny seeing their sexy, mouthwatering bodies so they decided to gangbang these two sexy sluts and fuck both of them one after the other.This dashing brunette has a peculiar secret. She loves getting wet and horny while wearing a leather dress and pantyhose. Catch her as she Squeezes out the juices from her pink pussy while she poses for her guilty pleasures.See how this filthy, nasty Black Posrha makes her move to seduce whoever she likes to fuck. Watch out as she pampers herself with this huge, Black rigid cock right in the street, making her tight pussy gapes as this thick cock thrust in and out of her cunt tunnel, and enjoys the gush of thick cum coming from this Black, huge wand.

PlayfulMisha Admire the sex prowess of these two youngsters, in their all out fuck session, as they are banging horny, bareback, fucking hard like a stray cats in heat, then bathing this slut Julia Taylor's face with lots of thick cum coming from this young man's cock.

Admire the sex prowess of these two youngsters, in their all out fuck session, as they are banging horny, bareback, fucking hard like a stray cats in heat, then bathing this slut Julia Taylors face with lots of thick cum coming from this young mans cock.This sexy and gorgeous brunette Marilyn Chambers was hired at a bachelors party as a gift. See these two studly men get naked and starts pampering this bitch with licks and kisses. Then, see this slut suck on one wild cock while her sweet pussy get viciously pounded by another from behind. Witness the fantastic ending of a showering of nut juice.The Angels were coerced into believing they needed to have sex to nurture the Angel Core inside. Ralph starts to feel awkward about his mission. For him this is not natural and its just taking advantage.This blonde babe, Candy Conner has working at the hotel have no customers. This male receptionist passes by and started flirting with her. See this slut as she gets blown away by this stud who eagerly licks and sucks her longing pussy. Wait until the end where they both moan in extreme satisfaction.

GIGOLOVSEX There's no further introduction for this sexy horny slut playing with herself. Caressing her beautiful body, she begins her sexcapade by pampering her cunt. She then plunges a black vibrator in her love hole arousing her more and starts the art of fucking until she reaches orgasm.

Theres no further introduction for this sexy horny slut playing with herself. Caressing her beautiful body, she begins her sexcapade by pampering her cunt. She then plunges a black vibrator in her love hole arousing her more and starts the art of fucking until she reaches orgasm.A scorching hot blonde is spotted withdrawing cash from an ATM. A horny stud took her home and let her savor a huge serving of man meat in front of the camera. She enjoyed filling her mouth with a thick hard schlong and delighted in the feeling of fresh creamy cum dripping from her mouth.Just like the other young girls, this hot brunette slut wants to experience another level of adventure - through fucking. So she let this gorgeous young stud pounds her with her too much of a mouthful, thick cock, ramming her deep and hard until she cums and reward herself with gush of thick cum.This pretty vixens Master inserts vibrating objects inside her pussy diverting the pain shes been experiencing lately but this is only one way to trick her as unfortunate she is being prepared to a much more excruciating sexcapade.

Video: New “Yogi Bear” movie actually a tearjerking dramatic ...

Sheer brilliance, although I think it helps if you don’t know the movie from which this scene was lifted. It’s not that it’ll spoil the surprise — the comic genius of this clip is that there is no surprise, that you know instantly how it’s going to go — but it’s less fun to think of it as a satire on some other flick than as a situation evolving organically between the characters. I was doubled over in laughter the first time I saw it. In fact, it’s so funny, and has exploded so hugely online, that apparently even Warner Bros. is okay with it. Although I’m not sure why: How can anyone fail to be disappointed by the real “Yogi Bear” movie after watching this? Then again, how can anyone fail to be disappointed by the real “Yogi Bear” movie, period?

If John Ford had lived long enough to make westerns starring sub-moronic animated bears, this would be that movie.

Daito Manabe's sensor-based drum machine might actually melt your ...

Believe it or not, this isn't the first time that Daito Manabe has used some electrical stimulation in a face-twisting musical experiment, but he's taken things one big step further with his latest project. As before, this rig creates wild facial twitches controlled by music (not the other way around), but it also includes a second set of sensors that allows another person to tap on a virtual drum kit and send the (hopefully) willing subject's face into a fit of synchronization. All of which is, of course, better seen than explained -- check it out in action after the break.

[Thanks, James]

Taxpayers take the IRS to court -- and actually win

It may be hard to believe, but it turns out that your chances of fighting the IRS in court -- and winning -- are actually better than getting hit by lightning (1 in 6,250), dying after a shark attack (9 in 152) or even having twins (3 in 100). In fact, the National Taxpayer Advocate's office found that over the course of a year, taxpayers won some portion or all of their cases roughly 14% of the time.

Taxpayers who were represented by counsel won about 20% of those cases, while those who represented themselves, referred to as pro se, prevailed in about 12% of them (download the entire report here). The predictable losers, with only a 6% success rate, were tax protesters who attempted to litigate based on frivolous arguments. On the other end of the spectrum, requests for "innocent spouse" treatment or other types of separation from joint liability were granted nearly 45% of the time.

Maryland Nurse Takes on the Tax Man
Among that sliver of people boldly taking on the IRS is Lori A. Singleton-Clarke, a nurse from Maryland, who fought the IRS in court, represented herself -- and won.

Singleton-Clarke's David and Goliath story began in 2006, when the IRS notified her that they would be auditing her 2005 tax return. On her federal income tax form for that year, she had reported $50,000 in income offset by a number of deductions, including $14,787 in educational expenses associated with her pursuit of an MBA/HCM (an MBA for health care management professionals) from the University of Phoenix, an online school. But the IRS wasn't buying it. After reviewing her filing, the IRS claimed she owed an additional $2,126 in income tax for 2005.

Singleton-Clarke agreed to eliminate some of her deductions but refused to budge on those related to her education expenses. After receiving several notices, including a Notice of Deficiency, Singleton-Clarke filed a challenge to the IRS in U.S. Tax Court. Since she couldn't afford an attorney, she represented herself.

In court, the IRS said that the educational expenses Singleton-Clarke claimed for deductions weren't sufficiently connected to her job as a nurse since an MBA isn't a nursing degree -- they cited Treas. Reg. 1.162-5(a), which states that, to be deductible, your expenses must be for education that either maintains or improves your job performance or is required by your employer or by law to keep your salary, status or job. The IRS specifically focused on the idea that the expenses can't be part of a program that will qualify you for a new job.

Singleton-Clarke argued that the educational expenses were indeed work-related. She had earned a bachelor of science degree in nursing from New York University in 1984 and had worked as a registered nurse at several hospitals and medical facilities for 24 years. She said she took the MBA courses at the University of Phoenix in order to gain greater credibility and make her more effective in her current position. After all, the University of Phoenix advertised the MBA/HCM degree as providing students "with the business management skills needed to manage successfully in today's health care delivery systems."

After reviewing Singleton-Clarke's job history, the Tax Court found that the MBA/HCM degree may have improved her preexisting skillset, but didn't qualify her for a new trade or business, as the IRS alleged. With that finding, the Tax Court allowed the expenses. You can read the Singleton-Clarke Tax Court opinion here.

Man Crashes Truck, Gets Cited for DUI and Beats the IRS

Like Singleton-Clarke, Justin M. Rohrs successfully represented himself in Tax Court after the IRS rejected a deduction that he made on his tax form and demanded that he pay additional taxes, plus a penalty.

Rohrs had taken a casualty loss deduction for his 2006 Ford F-350 pickup truck after he failed to properly negotiate a turn and went off the side of the road and into an embankment, totaling his truck. He was cited for the crash when his blood alcohol limit tested at .09, just over the legal limit in California.

Rohrs filed a loss with his insurance carrier, which was turned down. He then attempted to recover his loss by filing for a casualty loss deduction of $33,629 on his federal income tax return. The IRS disallowed the deduction and assessed a $6,230 federal income tax deficiency, plus a $1,246 penalty. Rohrs took the matter to court.

The pivotal question of the trial was whether Rohrs' drunk driving was considered a willful act. The IRS's case relied on Treas. Reg. 1.165-7(a)(3), which states that you can claim a casualty loss for damage to a vehicle only if the damage is not due to the willful act or willful negligence of a taxpayer.

After listening to Rohrs' testimony, the judge found that "[w]hile petitioner's decision to drive after drinking was negligent, that alone does not automatically rise to the level of gross negligence." The judge also said there was no evidence that Rohrs' drinking was the cause of the accident and ruled in his favor. (You can read the Rohrs Tax Court opinion here.)

Couple Discovers That Not All Tax Advice Is Right

Of course, pro se appearances don't always result in a win.

When Kenneth and Trudi Woodard filed a joint federal income tax return for 2004, they failed to include $150,000 in distributions from Kenneth's IRAs. The IRS subsequently assessed the Woodard's tax in the amount $27,606, plus a penalty. In response, the Woodards filed an appeal at Tax Court, representing themselves.

Kenneth told the court that he had relied on information that he claimed he found after a search on Google, and decided not to include the money on his tax return. Instead, he referred to the money as a "self-directed IRA" and claimed it wasn't reportable. He eventually agreed the income should have been reported, but argued the penalty shouldn't apply.

Relief from penalties can be granted in certain circumstances. Relying on third party tax advice may be a good excuse for abating a penalty so long as you use "ordinary business care and prudence." Unfortunately, Kenneth failed to provide the web site links he allegedly relied on, nor could he point to any other evidence that supported his claim. The court didn't believe he exercised ordinary business care and prudence when failing to report the IRA withdrawals. As a result, he lost the entire case. (You can read the Woodard Tax Court opinion here.)

Perseverance Will Help You Through

As encouraging as some of these cases may be, you can't rely on them to prove your own case. By law, a Tax Court opinion for a small case, or a dispute under $50,000, cannot be treated as precedent for other cases. There are, however, some good lessons to be learned from these taxpayers:

1. Stick to your guns. When you believe you're making the right decision, don't be intimidated. A majority of the cases filed in Tax Court are filed by pro se taxpayers; if you don't have the money to pay for an attorney, don't assume your case is a lost cause.


2. Be patient. It can take up to a year before your case is assigned a date once you file your petition. Singleton-Clarke didn't receive a favorable result until nearly three years after the IRS audited her return. Don't be put off by the passage of time. You might even take the time to try and resolve your case directly with the IRS; a majority of cases are settled before reaching Tax Court.


3. Be thorough. A case can turn on facts and circumstances. Be sure you understand the argument from the IRS and that your facts support your answer. Don't leave out key facts or evidence. Even if the evidence isn't necessarily flattering, such as Rohrs' blood alcohol content, it's part of your story. You need to offer sufficient detail for the court to understand your position.


4. Keep good records. When you get advice, write it down or ask your tax pro to put it in writing. Don't attempt, as Kenneth Woodard did, to rely on your memory.


5. Know enough to know when you're in over your head. I'm certainly not going to tell you that you have to hire an attorney to beat the IRS. Singleton-Clarke and Rohrs have proven that's not true. But if you're overwhelmed or you feel you need help, get an attorney. The IRS will certainly have one on their side.

Wait, Did 2010 Movies Actually Kick Ass? | Best Week Ever

Confession: This has been a bad year between me and movies. For whatever reason, I’ve barely made it out to the theater, and have only seen a handful of new releases on airplanes and the like. Sure, I could take part of the blame, but let’s face it, a lot of movies looked super megawatt sh*tty. Not all, but most. Or so I thought.

This video, Filmography 2010, has strung together all of this year’s biggest hits and misses in 6 minutes of action packed goodness. I can’t decide if some of these movies were really amazing or if when 300 movies are edited into one bite-sized, geniously edited short they all look great.

Oh, remember when I forgot how to have fun?? It happened in paragraph 1 starting with “Confession.” Forgot all of this conjecture about the year in film and just ENJOY. It’s brilliant.

No, but really, which of these movies should I see? (Other than Inception, duh.) If I said that I watched The Other Guys on an airplane last night and thoroughly enjoyed it, how will you judge me?

(via ONTD)